Thursday, October 22, 2026 • Socratic Session for Class 5.2. Deconstructing computational legal grammar, typing domains, black-box AI boundaries, and agent liability.
Examining how strict typing domains and computational legal grammars validate data at compile-time while establishing clear liability boundaries for autonomous AI agents.
Formal type systems and structured grammars eliminate natural-language ambiguity before a contract ever reaches execution.
Deterministic lambda calculus and type checking contrast sharply with probabilistic AI inference in high-stakes legal covenants.
Opaque legal-tech models create evidentiary and fiduciary hazards unless constrained by verifiable state-machine boundaries.
When autonomous agents execute transactions, principal-agent doctrine and cryptographic signets allocate legal accountability to human principals.